« Practice-oriented Provable-Security | Main | Information security as an alternative to horror novels »

Friday, 13 August 2010

More interesting fraud data from the Kansas City Fed

As I mentioned before, "The Changing Nature of U.S. Card Payment Fraud: Industry and Public Policy Options" by Richard J. Sullivan, has some interesting data about the nature of fraud. Here's what's in Table 2 in this document.

Card issuers

billions

Share of total loss

PIN debit

$0.028

Signature debit

$0.337

Credit cards

$1.240

ATM withdrawals

$0.397

Total issuer losses

$2.002

59%

Merchants

POS

$0.828

Internet, mail order, and telephone

$0.568

Total merchant losses

$1.396

41%

Total losses

$3.718

I noticed a few interesting things is this data:

  • Banks actually suffer more from card payments fraud than merchants do - roughly 50 percent more
  • For banks, ATM fraud is a almost one-third of credit card fraud
  • Merchants actually have more POS losses than CNP losses

I wouldn't have expected any of those to be true.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e55375ef1c88330133f2df64b2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More interesting fraud data from the Kansas City Fed:

Comments

Luther Martin

You can find historical charge-off rates for credit cards here:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/chgallsa.htm

They've gone up a lot in the past couple of years, but they seem to have hovered around 4 percent or so in the past. It looks like charge-off rates are now around 10 percent!

Patrick Florer

$3.7B is a big number, for sure.

But, as the report also asserts, fraud accounts for about $0.09 per $100 of transactions, which works out to less than 1/10th of a percent.

I have seen in other sources, which were not referenced, that bad debts cost banks approximatley $4 per $100 - roughly 40 times more than fraud.

Assuming these numbers to be approximately accurate, I know where I would focus my efforts if I were a bank.

The report provides figures from a number of years - the fraud numbers I cite are from 2006 - the author also comments that the fraud figure for 2009 declined to $3.3B in absolute terms, but rose somewhat as a percent of total transaction value.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Voltage Data Breach Index

  • Grab the Voltage Data Breach Index

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29